Who you show in your content sends a message about who you are, who you serve, and whose stories matter.
The representation audit
Look at your last 20 pieces of visual content. Ask:
- Are disabled people visible? Or is disability implied but invisible?
- When disabled people appear, how are they depicted?
- Are they in active, positive, agentic roles, or passive, dependent ones?
- Do they represent the diversity of disability (physical, sensory, cognitive, psychosocial)?
- Are the disabled people in your content the subjects of the story – or props in someone else’s?
What to avoid
Inspiration porn: Content that positions disabled people as inspirational objects for non-disabled audiences.
The grateful recipient: Content that positions disabled people as passive recipients of care rather than people with full lives and agency.
Tokenism: Including one disabled person in a stock photo and calling it inclusive representation.
Stock photos: Generic disability stock photography is often terrible. Real photos of real people you actually work with (with consent) are always more powerful.
What to aim for
- Disabled people shown as whole people with full lives
- Authentic representation of your actual participants and community
- Diversity within disability representation
- Stories that centre the disabled person’s perspective
- Consent processes that are genuine, not performative
Exercise
Conduct the representation audit on your last 20 pieces of visual content. What patterns do you notice? What would you change?